<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>lex parsimoniae - Latest Comments in The construction analogy</title><link>http://comporiented.disqus.com/</link><description>The pursuit of the simplest software possible.</description><atom:link href="https://comporiented.disqus.com/the_construction_analogy/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:20:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The construction analogy</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2009/10/the-construction-analogy/#comment-21334045</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Software would be much better for everyone if these problems were solved. Improving the development process is believed to be the key to solving these problems. Professionals working in the software development field often think "wouldn't it be nice if the process of building software was like the process of constructing a building?" We could be software architects and designers who conceive of the structure of the software. We could be &lt;a href="http://www.puttingpal.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.puttingpal.net"&gt;golf&lt;/a&gt; software project managers who control software projects. We could be software engineers and developers (construction workers) who actually figure out the details and build the software.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stevemartyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:20:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>