<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>lex parsimoniae - Latest Comments</title><link>http://comporiented.disqus.com/</link><description>The pursuit of the simplest software possible.</description><atom:link href="https://comporiented.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 23:24:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s the difference between an ISV, a VAR, and an SI?</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2006/04/whats_the_difference_between_an_isv__a_var__and_an_si/#comment-1376114129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks for the information ! I had been lost in these terms for a good while after entering a company n this field ^^''&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zora</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 23:24:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why is it so hard to buy a standard developer workstation?</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2013/06/why-is-it-so-hard-to-buy-a-standard-developer-workstation/#comment-1301790465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolute agreement.  I'm looking for a core i7 with Haswell chipset, 16GB RAM, 256 GB SSD.  I've been waiting for Apple to upgrade their Mini Mac but have just about given up.  Looks like I'll have to build myself a Linux box again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Wildgoose</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:56:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bug Tracking 101: Where TFS Blows It</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2007/05/bug_tracking_101_where_tfs_blows_it/#comment-1208166154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the update.  It's good to see these developments.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. Lambert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 12:07:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bug Tracking 101: Where TFS Blows It</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2007/05/bug_tracking_101_where_tfs_blows_it/#comment-1207958036</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you can log bugs without any licence now. check this out&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc668124.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc668124.aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/e...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh562968.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh562968.aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/e...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hassan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 07:42:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why is it so hard to buy a standard developer workstation?</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2013/06/why-is-it-so-hard-to-buy-a-standard-developer-workstation/#comment-1161676023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good to hear there's a vendor that does these.  I've always built my own workstations for home use, but there are plenty of shops that prefer buying machines only from big-name vendors, and they're typically pretty lousy at putting systems like this together.  I totally agree on the cost, by the way -- I've never found that I really save any money building a system myself, but I've got complete control over all the components, which is somewhat appealing to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. Lambert</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:43:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why is it so hard to buy a standard developer workstation?</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2013/06/why-is-it-so-hard-to-buy-a-standard-developer-workstation/#comment-1161555865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I buy my development machines from Puget Systems (no affiliation, just a satisfied customer). They can make just about any configuration you'd want. I like their stuff because:&lt;br&gt;1. They will make anything you want. Even if they don't carry a particular part, they'll get it if you ask.&lt;br&gt;2. They have great customer service and help you design your system&lt;br&gt;3. Their configuration website doesn't suck.&lt;br&gt;4. They will do custom stuff like install whatever OS you want. I just sent them a disc and they installed and tested it.&lt;br&gt;5. By the time you're done designing your system, if you add up all the parts and are able to find a similarly equipped machine elsewhere, the price will be about the same.....i.e. they are not more expensive for good machines (if you want a cheap off-the-shelf configuration for your sister-in-law, go to costco)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kyle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:22:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why is it so hard to buy a standard developer workstation?</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2013/06/why-is-it-so-hard-to-buy-a-standard-developer-workstation/#comment-976926792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Complete agreement with you on wondering why nobody markets development workstations, and on the pain and horrible design of the Dell web site.  One thing about a dev workstation, not sure why you want mirrored drives, I'd just as soon have one spinning and one external for backups.  Wish the SSDs were just a *little* more reliable and then I wouldn't want an old spinner at all.  If I have multiple drives, I'd want them independent ... unless I want my own SAN box.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Just Some Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 01:39:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/about/#comment-919858114</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your page layout and style is very elegant. Do you have any advise regarding BR engines? We are considering developing our own, but...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christophe Carbognin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:26:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s the difference between an ISV, a VAR, and an SI?</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2006/04/whats_the_difference_between_an_isv__a_var__and_an_si/#comment-845421539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! Very helpful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:03:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Meet the new phone, same as the old phone</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2010/03/meet-the-new-phone-same-as-the-old-phone/#comment-398853355</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The best thing I ever did for this phone was to flash Cyanogenmod 7 (Android) onto the phone, but you'll probably also want to look into flashing a new radio ROM -- either instead of or in addition to flashing Android. A new radio could make a pretty big difference in how the phone performs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. Lambert</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 10:58:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Meet the new phone, same as the old phone</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2010/03/meet-the-new-phone-same-as-the-old-phone/#comment-398764077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have an HD2 too and its T Mobile. Darn I really want to get this fixed. please tell me how..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Iamger18</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Use a null SMTP server for testing</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2008/09/use-a-null-smtp-server-for-testing/#comment-392194786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Try also Mailtrap - &lt;a href="http://mailtrap.io" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mailtrap.io"&gt;http://mailtrap.io&lt;/a&gt; : web based service.&lt;br&gt;It offers:&lt;br&gt;* All emails in one place&lt;br&gt;* Shared access for dev team to the inbox&lt;br&gt;* Developer tools to analyze emailsFlexible configuration&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogdan Gusiev</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 08:02:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Use .htaccess to redirect from Drupal to WordPress</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2008/08/use-htaccess-to-redirect-from-drupal-to-wordpress/#comment-386401155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm glad this was of some help.  The conversion I did was quite some time ago, and I'm not sure how well it's stood the test of time.  I'm contemplating one more conversion, however, so I may end up revisiting this again -- thanks for the pointer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. Lambert</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:49:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Use .htaccess to redirect from Drupal to WordPress</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2008/08/use-htaccess-to-redirect-from-drupal-to-wordpress/#comment-386268678</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been searching all day and that is the first blog article that is of use.  &lt;br&gt;Unfortunately a simple re-direct in the .htaccess won't do the trick &lt;br&gt;here since the parameter ?q=node/## needs to be converted to ?p=## on &lt;br&gt;the WordPress side.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Allin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:26:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SugarCRM for Job Search Management &amp;#8211; Part 2</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2006/05/sugarcrm_for_job_search_management_-_part_2/#comment-358199531</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let me point out another alternative software for vTiger. It`s &lt;a href="http://www.workforcetrack.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.workforcetrack.com"&gt; WorkforceTrack.com &lt;/a&gt;! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CherylJefferson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:57:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s the difference between an ISV, a VAR, and an SI?</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2006/04/whats_the_difference_between_an_isv__a_var__and_an_si/#comment-323020816</link><description>&lt;p&gt;David, solid clarification. Indeed the lines are blurry, and I've begun to think of these terms (and other channel labels) in terms of "heritage" as opposed to an all inclusive label. MSPs seem to be the force dujour today, seemingly taking the heritage of either a VAR or SI and evolving the finance and billing aspects to the business. In other words, adding "managed" to the transaction/project, as it were, in an on-going, annuity-based model.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChangeForge | Ken Stewart</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:00:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saving Microsoft</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2011/08/saving-microsoft/#comment-291998754</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The other side of that transaction, though, is that Google / Android isn't going to sit still and let Microsoft claw their way back into the market.  I couldn't agree more about all those other development platforms -- they're all going to try to achieve cross-platform development, which is the only way to bring sanity back to application development.  No business is going to want to pay to develop the same app three or four times if they've got a reasonable shot at developing it once and deploying to a bunch of platforms.  Those other platforms are going to be around for a while, though, so it's not reasonable for Microsoft to pretend they don't exist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. Lambert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:43:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saving Microsoft</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2011/08/saving-microsoft/#comment-291952012</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Motorola's acquisition by Google is another opportunity for Microsoft to capitalize on, now that the other Android integrators have a huge competitor as a partner. Others have also recognized this in light of observations noted. Delphi is moving aggressively, and oddly enough Flex/FlashBuilder is also similarly positioned, advantages there for both companies to lose. From what we've seen for some time (in this iPhone New Age) is that the driver is business justification (i.e., ROI) over techno whizbang, with the development tools getting more attention from those who sign the checks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chuck Brooks</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:38:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who comes up with this stuff?</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2011/07/who-comes-up-with-this-stuff/#comment-290089162</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://onlinecalculator.biz" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://onlinecalculator.biz"&gt;online calculator&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;       &lt;br&gt;   It's really great post.Thanks for sharing it. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vireendra yadav</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:49:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bug Tracking 101: Where TFS Blows It</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2007/05/bug_tracking_101_where_tfs_blows_it/#comment-282190823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, John, I think quite a bit has changed since I wrote that article.  While I do believe there's a web service you can connect to (see &lt;a href="http://phase2.com/blog/?p=141)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://phase2.com/blog/?p=141)"&gt;http://phase2.com/blog/?p=141)&lt;/a&gt;, my understanding is that the preferred integration method is to use the Client Object Model (see &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb130146.aspx)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb130146.aspx)"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/e...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. Lambert</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:18:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bug Tracking 101: Where TFS Blows It</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2007/05/bug_tracking_101_where_tfs_blows_it/#comment-282184785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey,&lt;br&gt;looks like many things have changed in TFS since this message has been posted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;is it possible to interact with the TFS via an webservice interface?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;regards&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;John&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:05:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Make a Visio Stencil</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/?p=30#comment-259051952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bernard - I haven't played with this extensively, but I think if you look at the following doc (near the bottom) it talks about something called the Dynamic Connector, which I believe is what's governing the behavior you're seeing.  Hopefully, this doc will get you pointed in the right direction:  &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa200985(v=office.10).aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa200985(v=office.10).aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/e...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. Lambert</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:41:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Make a Visio Stencil</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/?p=30#comment-258765673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Turning the background transparent was a lot of help. If I manually attach connectors to points, everything looks fine. For some reason connectors are still being obscured by the fame of the object if I allow them to snap with the red frame on.  This is not the case with shapes that come with Visio. With native shapes, the connectors always touch the object itself no matter how odd the shape. Can you help?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:50:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nothing short of world domination will do</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2010/04/nothing-short-of-world-domination-will-do/#comment-252577210</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As historian Chalmers Johnson predicts, “the United States will within a very short&lt;br&gt; time face financial or even political collapse at home and a &lt;br&gt;significantly diminished ability to project force abroad.” Moreover, the&lt;br&gt; so-called American empire faces a ... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dining Room Furniture</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Use .htaccess to redirect from Drupal to WordPress</title><link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2008/08/use-htaccess-to-redirect-from-drupal-to-wordpress/#comment-241899520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;check &lt;a href="http://modeling-languages.com/migrating-drupal-6-to-wordpress-3/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://modeling-languages.com/migrating-drupal-6-to-wordpress-3/"&gt;http://modeling-languages.c...&lt;/a&gt; to see how to crop the url in drupal to get only the last part and use this as permalink in wordpress. Then the redirection plugin in wordpress could be configured to redirect all former links to the new ones. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jordi Cabot</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 12:58:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>